Paper detail

Probing the Origin of Neutrino Mass: from GUT to LHC

Ever since the Majorana classic work, the nature of neutrino has been one of the central questions of the weak interaction physics. If neutrino is its own antiparticle, the immediate consequence is lepton number violation through the neutrinoless double beta decay. However, colliders such as the LHC offer a hope of seeing directly the same phenomenon, and moreover the Majorana nature of new particles needed to complete the Standard Model. I review here the salient features of these phenomena, and then turn to grand unification as a way of probing the scale of the relevant new physics. The minimal supersymmetric SO(10) theory basically eliminates the LHC physics, but leads naturally to the large atmospheric mixing angle and furthermore predicts $θ_{13} \simeq 10^\circ$ without any additional symmetries, in agreement with new T2K and MINOS data. It also assures that the R-parity is exact and thus leads to the stable LSP as a natural Dark Matter candidate. The minimal realistic SU(5) theory, on the other hand, predicts the light fermion triplet, below TeV, as a source of neutrino Majorana mass.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.