Paper detail

Probing the Nature of EROs through ASTRO-F/AKARI observations

We present a preliminary analysis of ASTRO-F data of a complete sample of ~150 EROs (R-K>5) down to K(Vega)<19, for which reliable photometric redshifts are available, in the range 0.8<z<2, selected over two fields (S7 and S2) of the MUNICS survey. The area covered is about 420 arcmin^2. We have imaged this area with AKARI telescope in N3 (3.4 micron), N60 (65 micron) and WL (150 micron) down to 12 microJy in the N3 filter, in order to detect the rest frame H or K-band emission, thus providing an excellent sampling of the SED of our EROs. From a first analysis we have an identification rate of ~63% in the N3 filter over the S7 field. These data allow us to distinguish starburst from passive early type phenomena, to meseaure the SFR of the starburst component and to constrain the mass assembly of early type galaxies.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.