Paper detail

Probing the low-redshift star formation rate as a function of metallicity through the local environments of type II supernovae

Type II SNe can trace star formation to probe its global metallicity distribution at low-redshift. We present oxygen and iron abundance distributions of SN II progenitor regions that avoid many previous sources of bias. Because Fe (rather than O) abundance drives the late stage evolution of the massive stars that are the progenitors of CCSNe, and because Fe enrichment lags O enrichment, we find a general conversion from O abundance to Fe abundance. The distributions we present here are the best yet standard of comparison for evaluating how rare classes of SNe depend on progenitor metallicity. We measure the gas-phase O abundance of a representative subsample of the hosts of SNe II from the first-year PTF SN search, using a combination of SDSS spectra near the SN location (9) and new long slit spectroscopy (25). The median metallicity of these 34 hosts is 12+log(O/H) = 8.65, with a median error of 0.09. The median host galaxy stellar mass from fits to SDSS photometry is 10^9.9 solar masses. They do not show a systematic offset in metallicity or mass from a redshift-matched sample of the MPA/JHU value-added catalog. In contrast to previous SN host metallicity studies, this sample is drawn from a single, areal survey. SNe in the lowest-mass galaxies are not systematically excluded. The metallicity distribution we find is statistically indistinguishable from the metallicity distribution of SN II hosts found by targeted surveys and by samples from multiple surveys with different selection functions. Using the relationship between Fe and O abundances found for Milky Way disk, bulge, and halo stars, we translate our O abundance distribution of SN II environments into Fe abundance estimates. We find that though this sample spans only 0.65 dex in O abundance, the gap between the Fe and O abundance is 50% wider at the low-metallicity end of our sample than at the high-metallicity end. (abridged)

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.