Paper detail

Probing Structure in Cold Gas at $z \lesssim 1$ with Gravitationally Lensed Quasar Sight Lines

Absorption spectroscopy of gravitationally lensed quasars (GLQs) enables study of spatial variations in the interstellar and/or circumgalactic medium of foreground galaxies. We report observations of 4 GLQs, each with two images separated by 0.8-3.0", that show strong absorbers at redshifts 0.4$<$$z_{abs}$$<$1.3 in their spectra, including some at the lens redshift with impact parameters 1.5-6.9 kpc. We measure H I Lyman lines along two sight lines each in five absorbers (10 sight lines in total) using HST STIS, and metal lines using Magellan Echellette or Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Our data have doubled the lens galaxy sample with measurements of H I column densities ($N_{\rm H I}$) and metal abundances along multiple sight lines. Our data, combined with the literature, show no strong correlation between absolute values of differences in $N_{\rm H I}$, $N_{\rm Fe II}$, or [Fe/H] and the sight line separations at the absorber redshifts for separations of 0-8 kpc. The estimated abundance gradients show a tentative anti-correlation with abundances at galaxy centers. Some lens galaxies show inverted gradients, possibly suggesting central dilution by mergers or infall of metal-poor gas. [Fe/H] measurements and masses estimated from GLQ astrometry suggest the lens galaxies lie below the total mass-metallicity relation for early-type galaxies as well as measurements for quasar-galaxy pairs and gravitationally lensed galaxies at comparable redshifts. This difference may arise in part from the dust depletion of Fe. Higher resolution measurements of H and metals (especially undepleted elements) for more GLQ absorbers and accurate lens redshifts are needed to confirm these trends.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.