Paper detail

Probing $L$-violating coupling via sbottom resonance production at the LHeC

We investigate the resonant production of the lighter sbottom at the proposed Large Hadron Electron Collider and its subsequent decay into $e^- + jet$ final state, under the single coupling dominance hypothesis in the framework of the $R$-parity-violating minimal supersymmetric standard model. It is concluded that the LHeC running at the high electron beam energy configuration of $E_e = 150 {\rm GeV}$ would provide excellent opportunities to search for the sbottom resonance and probe the lepton-number-violating $\hat{L}\hat{Q}\hat{D}$ $λ^{\prime}_{113}$-type Yukawa interaction. With about $1 fb^{-1}$ integrated luminosity expected in $E_e = 150 {\rm GeV}$ $e^-p$ collision at the LHeC, either the lighter sbottom RPV resonance could be directly detected up to $1 {\rm TeV}$, or the $L$-violating coupling $λ^{\prime}_{113}$ could be constrained at an unprecedented level of precision compared with all the knowledge derived from indirect measurements.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.