Paper detail

Probing Kepler's hottest small planets via homogeneous search and analysis of optical secondary eclipses and phase variations

We perform a homogeneous search for and analysis of optical occultations and phase variations of the most favorable ultra-short-period (USP) ($P<1$~d) sub-Neptunes ($R_{p}<4 R_{\oplus}$) observed by $\textit{Kepler}$ and K2, with the aim of better understanding their nature. We first selected 16 $\textit{Kepler}$ and K2 USP sub-Neptunes, based on the expected occultation signal. We filtered out stellar variability in the $\textit{Kepler}$ light curves, using a sliding linear fitting and, when required, a more sophisticated approach based on Gaussian Process regression. We simultaneously modeled the primary transit, secondary eclipse, and phase variations in a Bayesian framework, by using information from previous studies and knowledge of the Gaia parallaxes. We confirm the optical secondary eclipses for Kepler-10b ($13σ$), Kepler-78b ($9.5σ$), and K2-141b ($6.9σ$), with marginal evidence for K2-312b ($2.2σ$). We report new detections for K2-106b ($3.3σ$), K2-131b (3.2$σ$), Kepler-407b ($3.0σ$), and hints for K2-229b (2.5$σ$). For all targets with the exception of K2-229b and K2-312b, we also find phase curve variations with a confidence level higher than $2σ$. Two USP planets, namely Kepler-10b and Kepler-78b, show non-negligible nightside emission. This questions the scenario of magma-ocean worlds with inefficient heat redistribution to the night-side for both planets. Due to the youth of the Kepler-78 system and the small planetary orbital separation, the planet may still retain a collisional secondary atmosphere capable of conducting heat from the day to the night side. Instead, the presence of an outgassing magma ocean on the dayside and the low high-energy irradiation of the old host star may have enabled Kepler-10b to build up and retain a recently-formed collisional secondary atmosphere.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.