Paper detail

Probing Interstellar Grain Growth Through Polarimetry in the Taurus Cloud Complex

The optical and near-infrared (OIR) polarization of starlight is typically understood to arise from the dichroic extinction of that light by dust grains whose axes are aligned with respect to a local magnetic-field. The size distribution of the aligned-grain population can be constrained by measurements of the wavelength dependence of the polarization. The leading physical model for producing the alignment is radiative alignment-torques (RAT), which predicts that the most efficiently aligned grains are those with sizes larger than the wavelengths of light composing the local radiation field. Therefore, for a given grain-size distribution, the wavelength at which the polarization reaches a maximum ($λ_\mathrm{max}$) should correlate with the characteristic reddening along the line of sight between the dust grains and the illumination source. A correlation between $λ_\mathrm{max}$ and reddening has been previously established for extinctions up to $A_V\approx4$ mag. We extend the study of this relationship to a larger sample of stars in the Taurus cloud complex, including extinctions $A_V>10$ mag. We confirm the earlier results for $A_V<4$ mag, but find that the $λ_\mathrm{max}$ vs. $A_V$ relationship bifurcates above $A_V\approx4$ mag, with part of the sample continuing the previously observed relationship and the remaining part exhibiting a significantly steeper rise. We propose that the data exhibiting the steep rise represent lines-of-sight towards high density &#34;clumps,&#34; where grain coagulation has taken place. We present RAT-based modeling supporting these hypotheses. These results indicate that multi-band OIR polarimetry is a powerful tool for tracing grain growth in molecular clouds, independent of uncertainties in the dust temperature and emissivity.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.