Paper detail

Probing dark matter signals in neutrino telescopes through angular power spectrum

The hypothesis of two different components in the high-energy neutrino flux observed with IceCube has been proposed to solve the tension among different data-sets and to account for an excess of neutrino events at 100 TeV. In addition to a standard astrophysical power-law component, the second component might be explained by a different class of astrophysical sources, or more intriguingly, might originate from decaying or annihilating dark matter. These two scenarios can be distinguished thanks to the different expected angular distributions of neutrino events. Neutrino signals from dark matter are indeed expected to have some correlation with the extended galactic dark matter halo. In this paper, we perform angular power spectrum analyses of simulated neutrino sky maps to investigate the two-component hypothesis with a contribution from dark matter. We provide current constraints and expected sensitivity to dark matter parameters for future neutrino telescopes such as IceCube-Gen2 and KM3NeT. The latter is found to be more sensitive than IceCube-Gen2 to look for a dark matter signal at low energies towards the galactic center. Finally, we show that after 10 years of data-taking, they will firmly probe the current best-fit scenario for decaying dark matter by exploiting the angular information only.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.