Paper detail

Probing dark energy with tomographic weak-lensing aperture mass statistics

We forecast and optimize the cosmological power of various weak-lensing aperture mass ($M_{\rm ap}$) map statistics for future cosmic shear surveys, including peaks, voids, and the full distribution of pixels (1D $M_{\rm ap}$). These alternative methods probe the non-Gaussian regime of the matter distribution, adding complementary cosmological information to the classical two-point estimators. Based on the SLICS and cosmo-SLICS $N$-body simulations, we build Euclid-like mocks to explore the $S_8 - Ω_{\rm m} - w_0$ parameter space. We develop a new tomographic formalism which exploits the cross-information between redshift slices (cross-$M_{\rm ap}$) in addition to the information from individual slices (auto-$M_{\rm ap}$) probed in the standard approach. Our auto-$M_{\rm ap}$ forecast precision is in good agreement with the recent literature on weak-lensing peak statistics, and is improved by $\sim 50$% when including cross-$M_{\rm ap}$. It is further boosted by the use of 1D $M_{\rm ap}$ that outperforms all other estimators, including the shear two-point correlation function ($γ$-2PCF). When considering all tomographic terms, our uncertainty range on the structure growth parameter $S_8$ is enhanced by $\sim 45$% (almost twice better) when combining 1D $M_{\rm ap}$ and the $γ$-2PCF compared to the $γ$-2PCF alone. We additionally measure the first combined forecasts on the dark energy equation of state $w_0$, finding a factor of three reduction of the statistical error compared to the $γ$-2PCF alone. This demonstrates that the complementary cosmological information explored by non-Gaussian $M_{\rm ap}$ map statistics not only offers the potential to improve the constraints on the recent $σ_8$ - $Ω_{\rm m}$ tension, but also constitutes an avenue to understand the accelerated expansion of our Universe.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.