Paper detail

Probing boundary-corrections to Nambu-Goto open string energy levels in 3d SU(2) gauge theory

We measure the energy levels of the excitations of the flux tube between static quark and antiquark in three-dimensional SU(2) gauge theory. Combining exponential error reduction techniques and a variational method we are able to reduce the errors for the excited states significantly and to extract excited states in distinct parity and charge conjugation channels. It is conjectured that the infrared behavior (at large q\bar{q} separation R) of the flux tube is governed by an effective string theory. Indeed previous simulations show good agreement between lattice data and predictions from Nambu-Goto string theory. Recently, new results on the effective string theory obtained corrections to the Nambu-Goto predictions and showed that for the open string in three dimensions first corrections should appears at order 1/R^4. They correspond to boundary terms in the worldsheet field theory. These corrections are presumably small for the ground state, but significantly larger for the excited states and lift the degeneracies of the free theory. Assuming this functional form of the correction, we obtain for the coefficient b_2=-0.5(2)(2).

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.