Paper detail

Probing beyond-Kerr spacetimes with inspiral-ringdown corrections to gravitational waves

Gravitational waves from the explosive merger of distant black holes are encoded with details regarding the complex extreme-gravity spacetime present at their source. Famously described by the Kerr spacetime metric for rotating black holes in general relativity, what if effects beyond this theory are present? One way to efficiently test this hypothesis is to first obtain a metric which parametrically deviates from the Kerr metric in a model-independent way. Given such a metric, one can then predict the ensuing corrections to both the inspiral and ringdown portions of the gravitational waveform for black holes present in the new spacetime. With these tools in hand, one can then test gravitational wave signals for such effects by two different methods, (i) inspiral-merger-ringdown consistency test, and (ii) parameterized test. In this paper, we demonstrate the exact recipe one needs to do just this. We first derive parameterized corrections to the waveform inspiral, ringdown, and remnant properties for a generic non-Kerr spacetime and apply this to two example beyond-Kerr spacetimes each parameterized by a single non-Kerr parameter. We then predict the beyond-Kerr parameter magnitudes required in an observed gravitational wave signal to be statistically inconsistent with the Kerr case in general relativity. We find that the two methods give very similar bounds. The constraints found with existing gravitational-wave events are comparable to those from x-ray observations, while future gravitational-wave observations using Cosmic Explorer (Laser Interferometer Space Antenna) can improve such bounds by two (three) orders of magnitude.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.