Paper detail

Probing a cosmic axion-like particle background within the jets of active galactic nuclei

Axions or more generally axion-like particles (ALPs) are pseudo-scalar particles predicted by many extensions of the Standard Model of particle physics (SM) and considered as viable candidates for dark matter (DM) in the universe. If they really exist in nature, they are expected to couple with photons in the presence of an external electromagnetic field through a form of the Primakoff effect. In addition, many string theory models of the early universe motivate the existence of a homogeneous Cosmic ALP Background (CAB) with 0.1-1 keV energies analogous to the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), arising via the decay of string theory moduli in the very early universe. The coupling between the CAB ALPs traveling in cosmic magnetic fields and photons allows ALPs to oscillate into photons and vice versa. In this work, we test the CAB model that is put forward to explain the soft X-ray excess in the Coma cluster due to CAB ALPs conversion into photons using the M87 jet environment. Then we demonstrate the potential of the active galactic nuclei (AGNs) jet environment to probe low-mass ALP models, and to potentially constrain the model proposed to better explain the Coma cluster soft X-ray excess. We find that the overall X-ray emission for the M87 AGN requires an ALP-photon coupling $g_{aγ}$ in the range of $\sim7.50\times 10^{-15}-6.56\times 10^{-14}$ GeV$^{-1}$ for ALP masses $m_a \lesssim 10^{-13}$ eV as long as the M87 jet is misaligned by less than about 20 degrees from the line of sight. These values are up to an order of magnitude smaller than the current best fit value on $g_{aγ}\sim 2\times 10^{-13}$ GeV$^{-1}$ obtained in soft X-ray excess CAB model for the Coma cluster. Our results cast doubt on the current limits of the largest allowed value of $g_{aγ}$ and suggest a new constraint that $g_{aγ}\lesssim 6.56\times 10^{-14}$ GeV$^{-1}$ when a CAB is assumed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.