Paper detail

Probe and Adapt: Rate Adaptation for HTTP Video Streaming At Scale

Today, the technology for video streaming over the Internet is converging towards a paradigm named HTTP-based adaptive streaming (HAS). HAS comes with two unique flavors. First, by riding on top of HTTP/TCP, it leverages the network-friendly TCP to achieve firewall/NATS traversal and bandwidth sharing. Second, by pre-encoding and storing the video in a number of discrete bitrate levels, it introduces video bitrate adaptivity in a scalable way that the video encoding is excluded from the closed-loop adaptation. A conventional wisdom is that the TCP throughput observed by a HAS client indicates the available network bandwidth, thus can be used as a reliable reference for the video bitrate selection. We argue that this no longer holds true when HAS becomes a substantial fraction of the Internet traffic. We show that when multiple HAS clients compete at a network bottleneck, the presence of competing clients and the discrete nature of the video bitrates would together create confusion for a client to correctly perceive its fair-share bandwidth. Through analysis and real experiments, we demonstrate that this fundamental limitation would lead to, for example, video rate oscillation that negatively impacts the video watching experiences. We therefore argue that it is necessary to implement at the application layer a "probe-and-adapt" mechanism for HAS video rate adaptation, which is akin but orthogonal to the transport-layer network rate adaptation achieved by TCP. We present PANDA -- a client-side rate adaptation algorithm for HAS -- as an embodiment of this idea. Our testbed results show that compared to conventional algorithms, PANDA is able to reduce the instability of video rate by 60%, at a given risk of buffer underrun.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.