Paper detail

Probable ratio of the vacuum energy in a Schwarzchild-de Sitter space

The effects of the generalized uncertainty principle({\bf GUP}) on the cosmological constant problem are discussed in the Schwarzchild-deSitter spacetime, through studying the corrections to its thermodynamics. We derive the correction to the Hawking temperature of the cosmological horizon, by a heuristic method enlighten by gr-qc/0106080 . The logarithmic correction to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is also obtained. For an ordinary star (not a black hole), the probable ratio of the vacuum energy to the total energy within the cosmological horizon is 2/3, which roughly coincides with the evidences from the astronomical observations. For a black hole, the ratio tends to decrease. An inequality associating the energy density with the length of system is put forward for understanding the smallness of the cosmological constant, and the relation between the Bekenstein entropy bound and the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is also briefly discussed.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.