Paper detail

Probabilistic verification of partially observable dynamical systems

The construction and formal verification of dynamical models is important in engineering, biology and other disciplines. We focus on non-linear models containing a set of parameters governing their dynamics. The value of these parameters is often unknown and not directly observable through measurements, which are themselves noisy. When treating parameters as random variables, one can constrain their distribution by conditioning on observations and thereby constructing a posterior probability distribution. We aim to perform model verification with respect to this posterior. The main difficulty in performing verification on a model under the posterior distribution is that in general, it is difficult to obtain \emph{independent} samples from the posterior, especially for non-linear dynamical models. Standard statistical model checking methods require independent realizations of the system and are therefore not applicable in this context. We propose a Markov chain Monte Carlo based statistical model checking framework, which produces a sequence of dependent random realizations of the model dynamics over the parameter posterior. Using this sequence of samples, we use statistical hypothesis tests to verify whether the model satisfies a bounded temporal logic property with a certain probability. We use sample size bounds tailored to the setting of dependent samples for fixed sample size and sequential tests. We apply our method to a case-study from the domain of systems biology, to a model of the JAK-STAT biochemical pathway. The pathway is modeled as a system of non-linear ODEs containing a set of unknown parameters. Noisy, indirect observations of the system state are available from an experiment. The results show that the proposed method enables probabilistic verification with respect to the parameter posterior with specified error bounds.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.