Probabilistic lower bounds on maximal determinants of binary matrices

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

Let D(n){\mathcal D}(n) be the maximal determinant for n×nn \times n {±1}\{\pm 1\}-matrices, and R(n)=D(n)/nn/2\mathcal R(n) = {\mathcal D}(n)/n^{n/2} be the ratio of D(n){\mathcal D}(n) to the Hadamard upper bound. Using the probabilistic method, we prove new lower bounds on D(n){\mathcal D}(n) and R(n)\mathcal R(n) in terms of d=n−hd = n-h, where hh is the order of a Hadamard matrix and hh is maximal subject to h≤nh \le n. For example, R(n)>(πe/2)−d/2\mathcal R(n) > (πe/2)^{-d/2} if 1≤d≤31 \le d \le 3, and R(n)>(πe/2)−d/2(1−d2(π/(2h))1/2)\mathcal R(n) > (πe/2)^{-d/2}(1 - d^2(π/(2h))^{1/2}) if d>3d > 3. By a recent result of Livinskyi, d2/h1/2→0d^2/h^{1/2} \to 0 as n→∞n \to \infty, so the second bound is close to (πe/2)−d/2(πe/2)^{-d/2} for large nn. Previous lower bounds tended to zero as n→∞n \to \infty with dd fixed, except in the cases d∈{0,1}d \in \{0,1\}. For d≥2d \ge 2, our bounds are better for all sufficiently large nn. If the Hadamard conjecture is true, then d≤3d \le 3, so the first bound above shows that R(n)\mathcal R(n) is bounded below by a positive constant (πe/2)−3/2>0.1133(πe/2)^{-3/2} > 0.1133.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.