Paper detail

Probabilistic intuition holds for a class of small subgraph games

Consider the following two-player game on the edges of $K_n$, the complete graph with $n$ vertices: Starting with an empty graph $G$ on the vertex set of $K_n$, in each round the first player chooses $b \in \mathbb{N}$ edges from $K_n$ which have not previously been chosen, and the second player immediately and irrevocably picks one of these edges and adds it to $G$. We show that for any graph $H$ with at least one edge, if $b < c n^{1/m(H)}$, where $c = c(H) > 0$ only depends on $H$ and $m(H)$ is the usual density function, then the first player can ensure the resulting graph $G$ contains $Ω(n^{v(H)} / b^{e(H)})$ copies of $H$. The bound on $b$ is the best possible apart from the constant $c$ and shows that the density of the resulting graph for which it is possible to enforce the appearance of $H$ coincides with a threshold for the appearance in the Erdős-Rényi random graph. This resolves a conjecture by Bednarska-Bzdȩga, Hefetz, and Luczak and provides a prominent class of games for which probabilistic intuition accurately predicts the outcome. The strategy of the first player is deterministic with polynomial running time, with the degree depending on the size of $H$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.