Paper detail

Probabilistic detection of spectral line components

Resolved kinematical information, such as from molecular gas in star forming regions, is obtained from spectral line observations. However, these observations often contain multiple line-of-sight components, making estimates harder to obtain and interpret. We present a fully automatic method that determines the number of components along the line of sight, or the spectral multiplicity, through Bayesian model selection. The underlying open-source framework, based on nested sampling and conventional spectral line modeling, is tested using the large area ammonia maps of NGC 1333 in Perseus molecular cloud obtained by the Green Bank Ammonia Survey (GAS). Compared to classic approaches, the presented method constrains velocities and velocity dispersions in a larger area. In addition, we find that the velocity dispersion distribution among multiple components did not change substantially from that of a single fit component analysis of the GAS data. These results showcase the power and relative ease of the fitting and model selection method, which makes it a unique tool to extract maximum information from complex spectral data.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.