Paper detail

Probabilistic Conformance for Cyber-Physical Systems

In system analysis, conformance indicates that two systems simultaneously satisfy the same set of specifications of interest; thus, the results from analyzing one system automatically transfer to the other, or one system can safely replace the other in practice. In this work, we study the probabilistic conformance of cyber-physical systems (CPS). We propose a notion of (approximate) probabilistic conformance for sets of complex specifications expressed by the Signal Temporal Logic (STL). Based on a novel statistical test, we develop the first statistical verification methods for the probabilistic conformance of a wide class of CPS. Using this method, we verify the conformance of the startup time of the widely-used full and simplified model of Toyota powertrain systems, the settling time of model-predictive-control-based and neural-network-based automotive lane-keeping controllers, as well as the maximal voltage deviation of full and simplified power grid systems.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.