Paper detail

Probabilistic and Flux Landscapes of the Phage $λ$ Genetic Switch

The phage $λ$ infection of an \textit{E. coli} cell has become a paradigm for understanding the molecular processes involved in gene expression and cell signaling. This system provides an example of a genetic switch, as cells with identical DNA choose either of two cell cycles: a lysogenic cycle, in which the phage genome is incorporated into the host and copied by the host; or a lytic cycle, resulting in the death of the cell and a burst of viruses. The robustness of this switch is remarkable; although the first stages of the lysogenic and lytic cycles are identical, a lysogen rarely spontaneously flips, and external stressors or instantaneous cell conditions are required to induce flipping. In particular, the cell fate decision can depend on the populations of two proteins, cI and Cro, as well as their oligomerization and subsequent binding affinities to three DNA sites. These processes in turn govern the rates at which RNAp transcribes the cI and Cro genes to produce more of their respective proteins. In this work, a dynamical model of the non-equilibrium statistical mechanics is revisited and generalized. The low number of proteins and other sources of noise are non-negligble and corrections to the kinetics are essential to understanding the stability. To this end, general integral forms for advection-diffusion equations have been developed and numerically solved for a variety of mutants and assumptions about the state of the cells. These solutions quantify the probabilistic and flux landscapes of the ensembles' evolution in concentration space and are used to predict the populations of the cell states, entropy production, passage times, and potential barriers of wild type and mutant bacteria to illuminate some structure of the configuration space from which Nature naturally selects.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.