Paper detail

Private Federated Submodel Learning via Private Set Union

We consider the federated submodel learning (FSL) problem and propose an approach where clients are able to update the central model information theoretically privately. Our approach is based on private set union (PSU), which is further based on multi-message symmetric private information retrieval (MM-SPIR). The server has two non-colluding databases which keep the model in a replicated manner. With our scheme, the server does not get to learn anything further than the subset of submodels updated by the clients: the server does not get to know which client updated which submodel(s), or anything about the local client data. In comparison to the state-of-the-art private FSL schemes of Jia-Jafar and Vithana-Ulukus, our scheme does not require noisy storage of the model at the databases; and in comparison to the secure aggregation scheme of Zhao-Sun, our scheme does not require pre-distribution of client-side common randomness, instead, our scheme creates the required client-side common randomness via random SPIR and one-time pads. The protocol starts with a common randomness generation (CRG) phase where the two databases establish common randomness at the client-side using RSPIR and one-time pads (this phase is called FSL-CRG). Next, the clients utilize the established client-side common randomness to have the server determine privately the union of indices of submodels to be updated collectively by the clients (this phase is called FSL-PSU). Then, the two databases broadcast the current versions of the submodels in the set union to clients. The clients update the submodels based on their local training data. Finally, the clients use a variation of FSL-PSU to write the updates back to the databases privately (this phase is called FSL-write). Our proposed private FSL scheme is robust against client drop-outs, client late-arrivals, and database drop-outs.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.