Paper detail

Privacy-Preserving Database Fingerprinting

When sharing sensitive relational databases with other parties, a database owner aims to (i) have privacy guarantees for the database entries, (ii) have liability guarantees (via fingerprinting) in case of unauthorized sharing of its database by the recipients, and (iii) provide a high quality (utility) database to the recipients. We observe that sharing a relational database with privacy and liability guarantees are orthogonal objectives. The former can be achieved by injecting noise into the database to prevent inference of the original data values, whereas, the latter can be achieved by hiding unique marks inside the database to trace malicious parties (data recipients) who redistribute the data without the authorization. We achieve these two objectives simultaneously by proposing a novel entry-level differentially-private fingerprinting mechanism for relational databases. At a high level, the proposed mechanism fulfills the privacy and liability requirements by leveraging the randomization nature that is intrinsic to fingerprinting and achieves desired entry-level privacy guarantees. To be more specific, we devise a bit-level random response scheme to achieve differential privacy guarantee for arbitrary data entries when sharing the entire database, and then, based on this, we develop an $ε$-entry-level differentially-private fingerprinting mechanism. Next, we theoretically analyze the relationships between privacy guarantee, fingerprint robustness, and database utility by deriving closed form expressions. The outcome of this analysis allows us to bound the privacy leakage caused by attribute inference attack and characterize the privacy-utility coupling and privacy-fingerprint robustness coupling. Furthermore, we also propose a SVT-based solution to control the cumulative privacy loss when fingerprinted copies of a database are shared with multiple recipients.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.