Paper detail

Privacy Leakage in Proactive VR Streaming: Modeling and Tradeoff

Proactive tile-based virtual reality (VR) video streaming employs the viewpoint of a user to predict the tiles to be requested, renders and delivers the predicted tiles before playback. Recently, it has been found that the identity and preference of the user can be inferred from the trace of viewpoint uploaded for proactive streaming, which indicates that viewpoint leakage incurs privacy leakage. In this paper, we strive to answer the following questions regarding viewpoint leakage during proactive VR video streaming. When is the viewpoint leaked? Can privacy-preserving approaches (e.g., federated or individual training, using predictors with no need for training, or predicting locally) avoid viewpoint leakage? We find that if the prediction error or the quality of experience (QoE) metric is uploaded for adaptive streaming, the real viewpoint can be inferred even with the privacy-preserving approaches. Then, we define viewpoint leakage probability to characterize the accuracy of the inferred viewpoint, and respectively derive the probability when uploading prediction error and QoE metric. We find that the viewpoint leakage probability can be reduced by sacrificing QoE or increasing resources. Simulation with the state-of-the-art predictor over a real dataset shows that such a tradeoff does not exist only in rare cases.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.