Paper detail

PRISM: Refracting the Entangled User Behavior Space for E-Commerce Search

E-commerce search systems rely on modeling user behavior to estimate item relevance and user preference, which are typically assumed to be stable and independently learnable signals. However, in practice, user interactions are jointly shaped by exposure mechanisms, feedback loops, and semantic matching, leading to entangled and dynamically drifting behavioral signals. As a result, both preference estimation and relevance modeling suffer from confounding effects and semantic misalignment, which limits the robustness of downstream ranking models. To address this issue, we propose PRISM, a Preference-Relevance Interaction Semantic Modeling framework for e-commerce search behavior prediction. PRISM explicitly models the interaction between user preference and item relevance rather than treating them as independent components. Specifically, it introduces a preference rectification module to iteratively refine user preference under relevance-aware constraints, improving robustness against behavioral confounding. To ensure semantic consistency, we further incorporate a large language model (LLM)-driven semantic anchoring mechanism that leverages positive and negative prototypes to calibrate relevance representations. Finally, a preference-conditioned evidence routing module adaptively aggregates multi-source behavioral signals, enabling context-aware and preference-aligned relevance estimation. Extensive experiments on two public e-commerce benchmarks demonstrate that PRISM consistently outperforms strong baselines, validating the effectiveness of explicitly modeling preference-relevance interaction for robust and semantically grounded search behavior modeling.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.