Paper detail

Priority Range Trees

We describe a data structure, called a priority range tree, which accommodates fast orthogonal range reporting queries on prioritized points. Let $S$ be a set of $n$ points in the plane, where each point $p$ in $S$ is assigned a weight $w(p)$ that is polynomial in $n$, and define the rank of $p$ to be $r(p)=\lfloor \log w(p) \rfloor$. Then the priority range tree can be used to report all points in a three- or four-sided query range $R$ with rank at least $\lfloor \log w \rfloor$ in time $O(\log W/w + k)$, and report $k$ highest-rank points in $R$ in time $O(\log\log n + \log W/w' + k)$, where $W=\sum_{p\in S}{w(p)}$, $w'$ is the smallest weight of any point reported, and $k$ is the output size. All times assume the standard RAM model of computation. If the query range of interest is three sided, then the priority range tree occupies $O(n)$ space, otherwise $O(n\log n)$ space is used to answer four-sided queries. These queries are motivated by the Weber--Fechner Law, which states that humans perceive and interpret data on a logarithmic scale.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.