Paper detail

Priority Choice Experimental Two-qubit Tomography: Measuring One by One All Elements of Density Matrices

In standard optical tomographic methods, the off-diagonal elements of a density matrix $ρ$ are measured indirectly. Thus, the reconstruction of $ρ$, even if it is based on linear inversion, typically magnifies small errors in the experimental data. Recently, an optimal tomography [Phys. Rev. A 90, 062123 (2014)] has been proposed theoretically to measure one-by-one all the elements of $ρ$. Thus, the relative errors in the reconstructed state can be the same as those in the experimental data. We implemented this method for two-qubit polarization states performing both local and global measurements. For comparison, we also experimentally implemented other well-known tomographic protocols based solely on local measurements (of, e.g., the Pauli operators and James-Kwiat-Munro-White projectors) and those with mutually unbiased bases requiring both local and global measurements. We reconstructed seventeen of two-qubit polarization states including separable, partially and maximally entangled. Our experiments show the highest stability against errors of our method in comparison to the other quantum tomographies. In particular, we demonstrate that each optimally-reconstructed state} is embedded in the uncertainty circle of the smallest radius, both in terms of the trace distance and disturbance. We explain how to estimate experimentally the uncertainty radii for all the implemented tomographies and show that, for each reconstructed state, the relevant uncertainty circles intersect indicating the approximate location of the corresponding physical density matrix.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.