Paper detail

Principalization algorithm via class group structure

For an algebraic number field K with 3-class group \(Cl_3(K)\) of type (3,3), the structure of the 3-class groups \(Cl_3(N_i)\) of the four unramified cyclic cubic extension fields \(N_i\), \(1\le i\le 4\), of K is calculated with the aid of presentations for the metabelian Galois group \(G_3^2(K)=Gal(F_3^2(K) | K)\) of the second Hilbert 3-class field \(F_3^2(K)\) of K. In the case of a quadratic base field \(K=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{D})\) it is shown that the structure of the 3-class groups of the four \(S_3\)-fields \(N_1,\ldots,N_4\) frequently determines the type of principalization of the 3-class group of K in \(N_1,\ldots,N_4\). This provides an alternative to the classical principalization algorithm by Scholz and Taussky. The new algorithm, which is easily automatizable and executes very quickly, is implemented in PARI/GP and is applied to all 4596 quadratic fields K with 3-class group of type (3,3) and discriminant \(-10^6<D<10^7\) to obtain extensive statistics of their principalization types and the distribution of their second 3-class groups \(G_3^2(K)\) on various coclass trees of the coclass graphs G(3,r), \(1\le r\le 6\), in the sense of Eick, Leedham-Green, and Newman.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.