Paper detail

PRIMUS: Enhanced Specific Star Formation Rates In Close Galaxy Pairs

Tidal interactions between galaxies can trigger star formation, which contributes to the global star formation rate density of the universe and could be a factor in the transformation of blue, star-forming galaxies to red, quiescent galaxies over cosmic time. We investigate tidally-triggered star formation in isolated close galaxy pairs drawn from the Prism Multi-Object Survey (PRIMUS), a low-dispersion prism redshift survey that has measured ~120,000 robust galaxy redshifts over 9.1 deg^2 out to z ~ 1. We select a sample of galaxies in isolated galaxy pairs at redshifts 0.25 < z < 0.75, with no other objects within a projected separation of 300 h^-1 kpc and dz/(1+z) = 0.01, and compare them to a control sample of isolated galaxies to test for systematic differences in their rest-frame FUV-r and NUV-r colors as a proxy for relative specific SFR. We find that galaxies in r_p < 50 h^-1 kpc pairs have bluer dust-corrected UV-r colors on average than the control galaxies by -0.134 +/- 0.045 magnitudes in FUV-r and -0.075 +/- 0.038 magnitudes in NUV-r, corresponding to a ~15-20% increase in SSFR. This indicates an enhancement in SSFR due to tidal interactions. We also find that this relative enhancement is greater for a subset of r_p < 30 h^-1 kpc pair galaxies, for which the average colors offsets are -0.193 +/- 0.065 magnitudes in FUV-r and -0.159 +/- 0.048 magnitudes in NUV-r, corresponding to a ~25-30% increase in SSFR. We test for evolution in the enhancement of tidally-triggered star formation with redshift across our sample redshift range and find marginal evidence for a decrease in SSFR enhancement from 0.25 < z < 0.5 to 0.5 < z < 0.75. This indicates that a change in enhanced star formation triggered by tidal interactions in low density environments is not a contributor to the decline in the global star formation rate density across this redshift range.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.