Paper detail

Primordial tensor bispectra in $μ$-CMB cross-correlations

Cross-correlations between Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) temperature and polarization anisotropies and $μ$-spectral distortions have been considered to measure (squeezed) primordial scalar bispectra in a range of scales inaccessible to primary CMB bispectra. In this work we address whether it is possible to constrain tensor non-Gaussianities with these cross-correlations. We find that only primordial tensor bispectra with statistical anisotropies leave distinct signatures, while isotropic tensor bispectra leave either vanishing or highly suppressed signatures. We discuss how the angular dependence of squeezed bispectra in terms of the short and long momenta determine the non-zero cross-correlations. We also discuss how these non-vanishing configurations are affected by the way in which primordial bispectra transform under parity. By employing the so-called BipoSH formalism to capture the observational effects of statistical anisotropies, we make Fisher-forecasts to assess the detection prospects from $μT$, $μE$ and $μB$ cross-correlations. Observing statistical anisotropies in squeezed $\langle γγγ\rangle$ and $\langle γγζ\rangle$ bispectra is going to be challenging as the imprint of tensor perturbations on $μ$-distortions is subdominant to scalar perturbations, therefore requiring a large, independent amplification of the effect of tensor perturbations in the $μ$-epoch. In absence of such a mechanism, statistical anisotropies in squeezed $\langle ζζγ\rangle$ bispectrum are the most relevant sources of $μT$, $μE$ and $μB$ cross-correlations. In particular, we point out that in anisotropic inflationary models where $\langle ζζζ\rangle$ leaves potentially observable signatures in $μT$ and $μE$, the detection prospects of $\langle ζζγ\rangle$ from $μB$ are enhanced.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.