Paper detail

Primordial Power Spectrum features and $f_{NL}$ constraints

The simplest models of inflation predict small non-gaussianities and a featureless power spectrum. However, there exist a large number of well-motivated theoretical scenarios in which large non-gaussianties could be generated. In general, in these scenarios the primordial power spectrum will deviate from its standard power law shape. We study, in a model-independent manner, the constraints from future large scale structure surveys on the local non-gaussianity parameter $f_{\rm NL}$ when the standard power law assumption for the primordial power spectrum is relaxed. If the analyses are restricted to the large scale-dependent bias induced in the linear matter power spectrum by non-gaussianites, the errors on the $f_{\rm NL}$ parameter could be increased by $60\%$ when exploiting data from the future DESI survey, if dealing with only one possible dark matter tracer. In the same context, a nontrivial bias $|δf_{\rm NL}| \sim 2.5$ could be induced if future data are fitted to the wrong primordial power spectrum. Combining all the possible DESI objects slightly ameliorates the problem, as the forecasted errors on $f_{\rm NL}$ would be degraded by $40\%$ when relaxing the assumptions concerning the primordial power spectrum shape. Also the shift on the non-gaussianity parameter is reduced in this case, $|δf_{\rm NL}| \sim 1.6$. The addition of Cosmic Microwave Background priors ensure robust future $f_{\rm NL}$ bounds, as the forecasted errors obtained including these measurements are almost independent on the primordial power spectrum features, and $|δf_{\rm NL}| \sim 0.2$, close to the standard single-field slow-roll paradigm prediction.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.