Paper detail

Primordial gravitational waves from NANOGrav: a broken power-law approach

We revisit the possibility that the stochastic common-spectrum process recently detected by the NANOGrav pulsar timing array experiment could be due to primordial gravitational waves (GWs). A naïve extrapolation down to interferometer scales of the blue GW spectrum required to explain NANOGrav consistently with Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) observations would strongly violate upper limits on the stochastic GW background (SGWB) amplitude from LIGO/Virgo. In combination with the fact that there are over 19 decades in frequency between CMB and interferometer scales, this motivates us to move beyond the commonly adopted approximation of a pure power-law GW spectrum. We consider a broken power-law parametrization for the SGWB spectrum, which turns from blue to red above the break frequency: while phenomenological, this choice maps to various well-motivated early-Universe models, including scenarios featuring non-instantaneous reheating or a non-standard background expansion following reheating. After a detailed discussion of the contribution of the resulting SGWB to the early-Universe radiation energy density, we constrain the broken power-law model against a wide variety of multi-frequency cosmological and GW observations. We find that this phenomenological model is able to explain the NANOGrav signal while remaining in agreement with upper limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio on CMB scales, Big Bang Nucleosynthesis constraints on the early-Universe radiation energy density, and upper limits on the SGWB amplitude on interferometer scales. We briefly discuss the very bright prospects for testing this model with next-generation probes across the GW frequency landscape, which motivate further exploring connections to specific well-motivated early-Universe models.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.