Paper detail

Primordial Gravitational Wave Detectability with Deep Small-Sky CMB Experiments

We use Bayesian estimation on direct T-Q-U CMB polarization maps to forecast errors on the tensor-to- scalar power ratio r, and hence on primordial gravitational waves, as a function of sky coverage fsky. This method filters the quadratic pixel-pixel space into the optimal combinations needed for r detection for cut skies, providing enhanced information over a first-step linear separation into a combination of E, B and mixed modes, and ignoring the latter. With current computational power and for typical resolutions appropriate for r detection, the large matrix inversions required are accurate and fast. We explore two classes of experiments. One is motivated by a long duration balloon experiment like Spider, with pixel noise \propto \sqrt{fsky} for a specified observing period, but also applies to ground-based array experiments. We find that, ignoring systematic effects and foregrounds, an experiment with Spider-like noise over fsky ~0.02-0.2 could place a 2sigma_r ~0.014 (~95% CL) bound, rising to 0.02 with an L-dependent foreground residual. We contrast this with a Planck-like fixed instrumental noise as fsky varies, which gives a Galaxy-masked (fsky = 0.75) 2sigma_r ~0.015, rising to ~0.05 with the foreground residuals. Using for a figure of merit the (marginalized) 1D Shannon entropy of r, taken relative to the first 2003 WMAP1 CMB-only constraint, gives -1.7 (-1.9) bits from the 2010 WMAP7+ACT (2011 WMAP7+SPT) data, forecasts of -6 bits from Spider (plus Planck), of up to -11 bits for post-Planck satellites and -13 bits for a perfect cosmic variance limited experiment. We thus confirm the wisdom of the current strategy for r detection of deeply probed patches covering the fsky minimum-error trough with balloon and ground experiments.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.