Paper detail

Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter

We investigate models in which a spectrum of black holes with Hawking temperature of order the radiation temperature at the beginning of the radiation dominated era can survive long enough to produce a matter dominated era at the observed crossover between matter and radiation in our universe. We find that a sufficiently dense population of such black holes can indeed do so. The stronger observational constraint, that the black holes have lifetimes at least as long as the current age of the universe is harder to assess, because of black hole mergers during the matter dominated era. We then investigate whether the required densities and masses are consistent with the Holographic Space-time (HST) model of inflation. We find that they are, but put mild constraints on the slow roll parameter $ε= - \frac{\dot{H}}{H^2}$ in that model to be small. The bound is no stronger than the observational bound on the model's prediction for tensor fluctuations. The required black hole density, at the reheat temperature, in a model with a single species of black hole, must be viewed as a quantum mechanical accident. In such a model, our universe exists because of a low probability quantum fluctuation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.