Paper detail

Pricing European Options under Stochastic Volatility Models: Case of five-Parameter Variance-Gamma Process

The paper builds a Variance-Gamma (VG) model with five parameters: location ($μ$), symmetry ($δ$), volatility ($σ$), shape ($α$), and scale ($θ$); and studies its application to the pricing of European options. The results of our analysis show that the five-parameter VG model is a stochastic volatility model with a $Γ(α, θ)$ Ornstein-Uhlenbeck type process; the associated Lévy density of the VG model is a KoBoL family of order $ν=0$, intensity $α$, and steepness parameters $\fracδ{σ^2} - \sqrt{\frac{δ^2}{σ^4}+\frac{2}{θσ^2}}$ and $\fracδ{σ^2}+ \sqrt{\frac{δ^2}{σ^4}+\frac{2}{θσ^2}}$; and the VG process converges asymptotically in distribution to a Lévy process driven by a normal distribution with mean $(μ+ αθδ)$ and variance $α(θ^2δ^2 + σ^2θ)$. The data used for empirical analysis were obtained by fitting the five-parameter Variance-Gamma (VG) model to the underlying distribution of the daily SPY ETF data. Regarding the application of the five-parameter VG model, the twelve-point rule Composite Newton-Cotes Quadrature and Fractional Fast Fourier (FRFT) algorithms were implemented to compute the European option price. Compared to the Black-Scholes (BS) model, empirical evidence shows that the VG option price is underpriced for out-of-the-money (OTM) options and overpriced for in-the-money (ITM) options. Both models produce almost the same option pricing results for deep out-of-the-money (OTM) and deep-in-the-money (ITM) options

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.