Paper detail

Price Trends in a Simplified Model of the Wealth Game

We consider a simplified version of the Wealth Game, which is an agent-based financial market model with many interesting features resembling the real stock market. Market makers are not present in the game so that the majority traders are forced to reduce the amount of stocks they trade, in order to have a balance in the supply and demand. The strategy space is also simplified so that the market is only left with strategies resembling the decisions of optimistic or pessimistic fundamentalists and trend-followers in the real stock market. A dynamical phase transition between a trendsetters' phase and a bouncing phase is discovered in the space of price sensitivity and market impact. Analysis based on a semi-empirical approach explains the phase transition and locates the phase boundary. A phase transition is also observed when the fraction of trend-following strategies increases, which can be explained macroscopically by matching the supply and demand of stocks.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.