Paper detail

Pressure-induced gap closing and metallization of MoSe$_{2}$ and MoTe$_{2}$

Layered molybdenum dichalchogenides are semiconductors whose gap is controlled by delicate interlayer interactions. The gap tends to drop together with the interlayer distance, suggesting collapse and metallization under pressure. We predict, based on first principles calculations, that layered semiconductors 2H$_c$-MoSe$_2$ and 2H$_c$-MoTe$_2$ should undergo metallization at pressures between 28 and 40 GPa (MoSe$_2$) and 13 and 19 GPa (MoTe$_2$). Unlike MoS$_2$ where a 2H$_c$ $\to$ 2H$_a$ layer sliding transition is known to take place, these two materials appear to preserve the original 2H$_c$ layered structure at least up to 100 GPa and to increasingly resist lubric layer sliding under pressure. Similar to metallized MoS$_2$ they are predicted to exhibit a low density of states at the Fermi level, and presumably very modest superconducting temperatures if any. We also study the $β$-MoTe$_2$ structure, metastable with a higher enthalpy than 2H$_c$-MoTe$_2$. Despite its ready semimetallic and (weakly) superconducting character already at zero pressure, metallicity is not expected to increase dramatically with pressure.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.