Paper detail

Pressure-induced decomposition of solid hydrogen sulfide

Solid hydrogen sulfide is well known as a typical molecular crystal but its stability under pressure is still under debate. Particularly, Eremets et al. found the high pressure superconductivity with $T_{c}\approx$ 190 K in a H$_{2}$S sample [arXiv: 1412.0460 (2014)] which is associates with the elemental decomposition into H$_{3}$S [Sci. Rep. 4, 6968 (2014)]. Therefore, on what pressure H$_{2}$S can decompose and which kind of the products of decomposition urgent need to be solved. In this paper, we have performed an extensive structural study on different stoichiometries H$_{n}$S with ${n> 1}$ under high pressure using $ab$ $initio$ calculations. Our results show that H$_{2}$S is stable below 50 GPa and decomposes into H$_3$S and sulfur at high pressure, while H$_{3}$S is stable at least up to 300 GPa. The other hydrogen-rich H$_{4}$S, H$_{5}$S, and H$_{6}$S are unstable in the pressure range from 20 to 300 GPa.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.