Paper detail

Preparations for detecting and characterizing gravitational-wave signals from binary black hole coalescences

We evaluate how well EOBNR waveforms, obtained from the effective one-body formalism, perform in detecting gravitational wave (GW) signals from binary black hole (BBH) coalescences modelled by numerical relativity (NR) groups participating in the second edition of the numerical injection analysis (NINJA-2). In this study, NINJA-2 NR-based signals that are available in the public domain were injected in simulated Gaussian, stationary data prepared for three LIGO-Virgo detectors with early Advanced LIGO sensitivities. Here we studied only non-spinning BBH signals. A total of 2000 such signals from 20 NR-based signal families were injected in a two-month long data set. The all-sky, all-time compact binary coalescence (CBC) search pipeline was run along with an added coherent stage to search for those signals. We find that the EOBNR templates are only slightly less efficient (by a few percent) in detecting non-spinning NR-based signals than in detecting EOBNR injections. On the other hand, the coherent stage improves the signal detectability by a few percent over a coincident search.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.