Paper detail

Preferential site occupancy of alloying elements in TiAl-based phases

First principles calculations are used to study the preferential occupation of ternary alloying additions into the binary Ti-Al phases, namely $γ$-TiAl, $α_2$-Ti$_3$Al, $β_{\mathrm{o}}$-TiAl, and B19-TiAl. While the early transition metals (TMs, group IVB, VB , and VIB elements) prefer to substitute for Ti atoms in the $γ$-, $α_2$-, and B19-phases, they preferentially occupy Al sites in the $β_{\mathrm{o}}$-TiAl. Si is in this context an anomaly, as it prefers to sit on the Al sublattice for all four phases. B and C are shown to prefer octahedral Ti-rich interstitial positions instead of substitutional incorporation. The site preference energy is linked with the alloying-induced changes of energy of formation, hence alloying-related (de)stabilisation of the phases. We further show that the phase-stabilisation effect of early TMs on $β_{\mathrm{o}}$-phase has a different origin depending on their valency. Finally, an extensive comparison of our predictions with available theoretical and experimental data (which is, however, limited mostly to the $γ$-phase) shows a consistent picture.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.