Paper detail

Preemptive Termination of Suggestions during Sequential Kriging Optimization of a Brain Activity Reconstruction Simulation

Reconstructing brain activity through electroencephalography requires a boundary value problem (BVP) solver to take a proposed distribution of current dipoles within the brain and compute the resulting electrostatic potential on the scalp. This article proposes the use of sequential kriging optimization to identify different optimal BVP solver parameters for dipoles located in isolated sections of the brain by considering the cumulative impact of randomly oriented dipoles within a chosen isolated section. We attempt preemptive termination of parametrizations suggested during the sequential kriging optimization which, given the results to that point, seem unlikely to produce high quality solutions. Numerical experiments on a simplification of the full geometry for which an approximate solution is available show a benefit from this preemptive termination.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.