Paper detail

Predictions Wrong Again on Dead Zone Area -- Gulf of Mexico Gaining Resistance to Nutrient Loading

Mississippi River nutrient loads and water stratification on the Louisiana-Texas shelf contribute to an annually recurring, short-lived hypoxic bottom layer in areas of the northern Gulf of Mexico comprising less than 2% of the total Gulf of Mexico bottom area. This paper observes that the NOAA and LUMCON have now published errant predictions of possible record size areas of temporary bottom water hypoxia ("dead zones") three times since 2005, in 2008, 2011, and 2013 and that the LUMCON predictions of the area of hypoxic bottom water average 31% higher than the actual measured hypoxic areas from 2006 to 2014. These systematically high predictions depend on the assumption that the susceptibility of the Gulf of Mexico to forming hypoxic areas in response to nutrient loading has been relatively constant since 2001, though the susceptibility has been occasionally adjusted upward in different models. It has been previously suggested that tropical storms in a given year that occur on the Louisiana-Texas shelf between the peak nutrient loading in spring and formation of the hypoxic zone in summer can mitigate the size of the hypoxic zone that year through mixing of stratified well oxygenated lighter and warmer surface layers and oxygen depleted heavier and cooler bottom layers. This paper suggests several reasons why the Louisiana-Texas shelf may be systematically growing less susceptible to a given level of nutrient loading over time so that predictions based on the measured area of temporary bottom water hypoxia prior to 2006 tend to be too big in recent years.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.