Paper detail

Predictions of a fundamental statistical picture

The discovery of a Higgs boson at the electroweak scale appears to point toward supersymmetry, as the most likely mechanism for protecting a scalar boson mass from enormous radiative corrections. The earlier discovery of neutrino masses similarly appears to point toward grand unification of nongravitational forces, which permits (for neutrinos) Majorana masses, Dirac masses, and a seesaw mechanism to drive the observed masses down to low values. A third major discovery, cosmic acceleration suggesting a relatively tiny cosmological constant, appears to point toward truly revolutionary new physics. Many other problems and mysteries also indicate a need for fresh ideas at the most fundamental level. Here a picture is proposed in which standard physics and its extensions are obtained (through a nontrivial set of arguments) from statistical counting and the local geography of our universe. The unavoidable predictions include supersymmetry (at some energy scale), SO(N) grand unification, a drastic diminishing of the usual cosmological constant, and a nonsupersymmetric dark matter WIMP which should be detectable within the next several years.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.