Paper detail

Predictions for local PNG bias in the galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum and the consequences for $f_{\rm NL}$ constraints

We use hydrodynamical separate universe simulations with the IllustrisTNG model to predict the local primordial non-Gaussianity (PNG) bias parameters $b_ϕ$ and $b_{ϕδ}$, which enter at leading order in the galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum. This is the first time that $b_{ϕδ}$ is measured from either gravity-only or galaxy formation simulations. For dark matter halos, the popular assumption of universality overpredicts the $b_{ϕδ}(b_1)$ relation in the range $1 \lesssim b_1 \lesssim 3$ by up to $Δb_{ϕδ} \sim 3$ ($b_1$ is the linear density bias). The adequacy of the universality relation is worse for the simulated galaxies, with the relations $b_ϕ(b_1)$ and $b_{ϕδ}(b_1)$ being generically redshift-dependent and very sensitive to how galaxies are selected (we test total, stellar and black hole mass, black hole mass accretion rate and color). The uncertainties on $b_ϕ$ and $b_{ϕδ}$ have a direct, often overlooked impact on the constraints of the local PNG parameter $f_{\rm NL}$, which we study and discuss. For a survey with $V = 100{\rm Gpc}^3/h^3$ at $z=1$, uncertainties $Δb_ϕ \lesssim 1$ and $Δb_{ϕδ} \lesssim 5$ around values close to the fiducial can yield relatively unbiased constraints on $f_{\rm NL}$ using power spectrum and bispectrum data. We also show why priors on galaxy bias are useful even in analyses that fit for products $f_{\rm NL} b_ϕ$ and $f_{\rm NL} b_{ϕδ}$. The strategies we discuss to deal with galaxy bias uncertainties can be straightforwardly implemented in existing $f_{\rm NL}$ constraint analyses (we provide fits for some of the bias relations). Our results motivate more works with galaxy formation simulations to refine our understanding of $b_ϕ$ and $b_{ϕδ}$ towards improved constraints on $f_{\rm NL}$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.