Paper detail

Prediction of shock wave configurations in compression ramp flows

Here, we provide a theoretical framework revealing that a steady compression ramp flow must have the minimal dissipation of kinetic energy, and can be demonstrated using the least action principle. For a given inflow Mach number $M_{0}$ and ramp angle $α$, the separation angle $θ_{s}$ manifesting flow system states can be determined based on this theory. Thus, both the shapes of shock wave configurations and pressure peak $p_{peak}$ behind reattachment shock waves are predictable. These theoretical predictions agree excellently with both experimental data and numerical simulations, covering a wide range of $M_{0}$ and $α$. In addition, for a large separation, the theory indicates that $θ_{s}$ only depends on $M_{0}$ and $α$, but is independent of the Reynolds number $Re$ and wall temperature $T_{w}$. These facts suggest that the proposed theoretical framework can be applied to other flow systems dominated by shock waves, which are ubiquitous in aerospace engineering.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.