Paper detail

Prediction of Memory Retrieval Performance Using Ear-EEG Signals

Many studies have explored brain signals during the performance of a memory task to predict later remembered items. However, prediction methods are still poorly used in real life and are not practical due to the use of electroencephalography (EEG) recorded from the scalp. Ear-EEG has been recently used to measure brain signals due to its flexibility when applying it to real world environments. In this study, we attempt to predict whether a shown stimulus is going to be remembered or forgotten using ear-EEG and compared its performance with scalp-EEG. Our results showed that there was no significant difference between ear-EEG and scalp-EEG. In addition, the higher prediction accuracy was obtained using a convolutional neural network (pre-stimulus: 74.06%, on-going stimulus: 69.53%) and it was compared to other baseline methods. These results showed that it is possible to predict performance of a memory task using ear-EEG signals and it could be used for predicting memory retrieval in a practical brain-computer interface.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.