Paper detail

Predicting the X-ray flux of evolved pulsar wind nebulae based on VHE gamma-ray observations

Energetic pulsars power winds of relativistic leptons which produce photon nebulae (so- called pulsar wind nebulae, PWNe). Their spectral energy distribution has a double-humped structure: the first hump lies in the X-ray regime, the second in the gamma-ray range. The X-ray emission is generally understood as synchrotron radiation by highly energetic leptons, the gamma-ray emission as Inverse Compton scattering of energetic leptons with ambient photon fields. The spectral evolution is influenced by the time-dependent spin-down of the pulsar and the decrease of the magnetic field strength with time. Thus, the present spectral appearance of a PWN depends on the age of the pulsar: while young PWNe are bright in X-rays and gamma-rays, the X-ray emission of evolved PWNe is suppressed. Hence, evolved pulsar wind nebulae may offer an explanation of the nature of some of the unidentified VHE (very high-energy, E > 100GeV) gamma-ray sources not yet associated with a counterpart at other wavelengths. The purpose of this work is to develop a model which allows to calculate the expected X-ray fluxes of unidentified VHE gamma-ray sources considered to be PWN candidates. Such an estimate may help to evaluate the prospects of detecting the X-ray signal in deep observations with current X-ray observatories in future studies. We present a time-dependent leptonic model which predicts the broad-band emission of a PWN according to the characteristics of its pulsar. For a sample of representative PWNe, the resulting model predictions in the X-ray and gamma-ray range are compared to observations. The comparison shows that the energy flux of the X-ray emission of identified PWNe from different states of evolution can be roughly predicted by the model. This implies the possibility of an estimate of the non-thermal X-ray emission of unidentified VHE gamma-ray sources in case of an evolved PWN scenario.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.