Paper detail

Predicting the Values of the Leptonic CP Violation Phases

Using the fact that the neutrino mixing matrix $U = U^\dagger_{e}U_ν$, where $U_{e}$ and $U_ν$ result from the diagonalisation of the charged lepton and neutrino mass matrices, we consider a number of forms of $U_ν$ associated with a variety of flavour symmetries: i) bimaximal (BM) and ii) tri-bimaximal (TBM) forms, the forms corresponding iii) to the conservation of the lepton charge $L' = L_e - L_μ- L_τ$ (LC), iv) to golden ratio type A (GRA) mixing, v) golden ratio type B (GRB) mixing, and iii) to hexagonal (HG) mixing. Employing the minimal form of $U_e$ that can provide the requisite corrections to $U_ν$ so that reactor, atmospheric and solar neutrino mixing angles $θ_{13}$, $θ_{23}$ and $θ_{12}$ have values compatible with the current data, including a possible sizable deviation of $θ_{23}$ from $π/4$, we discuss the possibility to obtain predictions for the CP violation phases in the neutrino mixing matrix. Following the approach developed in [1] we derive predictions for the Dirac phase $δ$ and the rephasing invariant $J_{\rm CP}$ in the cases of GRA, GRB and HG forms of $U_ν$ (results for the TBM and BM (LC) forms were obtained in [1]). We show also that under rather general conditions within the scheme considered the values of the Majorana phases in the PMNS matrix can be predicted for each of the forms of $U_ν$ discussed. We give examples of these predictions and of their implications for neutrinoless double beta decay. In the GRA, GRB and HG cases, as in the TBM one, relatively large CP violation effects in neutrino oscillations are predicted ($|J_{CP}| \sim (0.031 - 0.034)$). Distinguishing between the TBM, BM (LC), GRA, GRB and HG forms of $U_ν$ requires a measurement of $\cosδ$ or a relatively high precision measurement of $J_{\rm CP}$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.