Paper detail

Predicting Missing Information of Key Aspects in Vulnerability Reports

Software vulnerabilities have been continually disclosed and documented. An important practice in documenting vulnerabilities is to describe the key vulnerability aspects, such as vulnerability type, root cause, affected product, impact, attacker type and attack vector, for the effective search and management of fast-growing vulnerabilities. We investigate 120,103 vulnerability reports in the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) over the past 20 years. We find that 56%, 85%, 38% and 28% of CVEs miss vulnerability type, root causes, attack vector and attacker type respectively. To help to complete the missing information of these vulnerability aspects, we propose a neural-network based approach for predicting the missing information of a key aspect of a vulnerability based on the known aspects of the vulnerability. We explore the design space of the neural network models and empirically identify the most effective model design. Using a large-scale vulnerability datas\-et from CVE, we show that we can effectively train a neural-network based classifier with less than 20% of historical CVEs. Our model achieves the prediction accuracy 94%, 79%, 89%and 70% for vulnerability type, root cause, attacker type and attack vector, respectively. Our ablation study reveals the prominent correlations among vulnerability aspects and further confirms the practicality of our approach.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.