Paper detail

Predicting Bit Error Rate from Meta Information using Random Forests

With the increasing power of machine learning-based reasoning, the use of meta-information (e.g., digital signal modulation parameters, channel conditions, etc.) to predict the performance of various signal processing techniques has become feasible. One such problem of practical interest is choosing a proper interference mitigation method based on the meta information of the received signal. Since heuristic table-based methods suffer from limited prediction capability for unseen cases, we propose a recommendation system based on the use of Random Forests (RF). Specifically, RF used to predict the Bit-Error-Rate (BER) of all mitigation approaches so as to determine the approach with the best performance. We found RF can predict BER with high accuracy, and its importance factor demonstrates which input attributes matter most. These BER prediction results can also benefit other functions such as adaptive modulation, channel sensing, beaming selection, etc.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.