Paper detail

Predicted Information Content of Gaia-Hipparcos

The Gaia-Tycho release, scheduled for 14 September, is forecast to yield parallax errors of $σ(π)\sim 300\,μ$as for about 2 million Tycho stars. We show analytically that the actual performance should be $$ σ(π) = {\rm max}(σ_{1991}/96,20\,μ{\rm as}) $$ where $σ_{1991}$ is the positional error from the Hipparcos mission. For typical Tycho stars, $σ_{1991}\sim 30\,$mas, so this reproduces the usual claims. However, for the 100,000 star Hipparcos subset of this sample, $σ_{1991}$ is a factor 15 or more smaller. These much lower Hipparcos positional errors apply even to stars at the Hipparcos-Tycho limit, $V\sim 12$. This is especially important for RR Lyrae stars, as well as other special classes, that were systematically included in the Hipparcos catalog down to this limit because of their exceptional scientific importance. This predicted performance will provide an early test of the Gaia algorithms.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.